Select Location

Divorce

I WANT A DIVORCE
0 likes
1 answers
Family
Posted on 8th Oct, 2018
D
Advocate DEEPTI
Answered on 18th Jan, 2019
13 Divorce. — (1) Any marriage solemnised, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, may, on a petition presented by either the husband or the wife, be dissolved by a decree of divorce on the ground that the other party— 16 [(i) has, after the solemnisation of the marriage, had voluntary sexual intercourse with any person other than his or her spouse; or] 16 [(ia) has, after the solemnisation of the marriage, treated the petitioner with cruelty; or] 16 [(ib) has deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition; or] (ii) has ceased to be a Hindu by conversion to another religion; or 17 [(iii) has been incurably of unsound mind, or has been suffering continuously or intermittently from mental disorder of such a kind and to such an extent that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent. Explanation .—In this clause,— (a) the expression “mental disorder” means mental illness, arrested or incomplete development of mind, psychopathic disorder or any other disorder or disability of mind and includes schizophrenia; (b) the expression “psychopathic disorder” means a persistent disorder or disability of mind (whether or not including sub-normality of intelligence) which results in abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible conduct on the part of the other party, and whether or not it requires or is susceptible to medical treatment; or] (iv) has 18 [***] been suffering from a virulent and incurable form of leprosy; or (v) has 18 [***] been suffering from venereal disease in a communicable form; or (vi) has renounced the world by entering any religious order; or (vi) has not been heard of as being alive for a period of seven years or more by those persons who would naturally have heard of it, had that party been alive; 19 [***] 20 [ Explanation. —In this sub-section, the expression “desertion” means the desertion of the petitioner by the other party to the marriage without reasonable cause and without the consent or against the wish of such party, and includes the wilful neglect of the petitioner by the other party to the marriage, and its grammatical variations and cognate expressions shall be construed accordingly.] 21 [***] 22 [(1A) Either party to a marriage, whether solemnised before or after the commencement of this Act, may also present a petition for the dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground— (i) that there has been no resumption of cohabitation as between the parties to the marriage for a period of 22 [one year] or upwards after the passing of a decree for judicial separation in a proceeding to which they were parties; or (ii) that there has been no restitution of conjugal rights as between the parties to the marriage for a period of 22 [one year] or upwards after the passing of a decree for restitution of conjugal rights in a proceeding to which they were parties.] (2) A wife may also present a petition for the dissolution of her marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground,— (i) in the case of any marriage solemnised before the commencement of this Act, that the husband had married again before such commencement or that any other wife of the husband married before such commencement was alive at the time of the solemnisation of the marriage of the petitioner: Provided that in either case the other wife is alive at the time of the presentation of the petition; or (ii) that the husband has, since the solemnisation of the marriage, been guilty of rape, sodomy or 23 [bestiality; or] 24 [(iii) that in a suit under section 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (78 of 1956), or in a proceeding under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) [or under the corresponding section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (5 of 1898)], a decree or order, as the case may be, has been passed against the husband awarding maintenance to the wife notwithstanding that she was living apart and that since the passing of such decree or order, cohabitation between the parties has not been resumed for one year or upwards; or 25 [(iv) that her marriage (whether consummated or not) was solemnised before she attained the age of fifteen years and she has repudiated the marriage after attaining that age but before attaining the age of eighteen years.] Explanation. —This clause applies whether the marriage was solemnised before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (68 of 1976)*.] State Amendment Uttar Pradesh: In its application to Hindus domiciled in Uttar Pradesh and also when either party to the marriage was not at the time of marriage a Hindu domiciled in Uttar Pradesh, in section 13— (i) in sub-section (1), after clause (i) insert (and shall be deemed always to have been inserted) the following clause, namely:— “(1a) has persistently or repeatedly treated the petitioner with such cruelty as to cause a reasonable apprehension in the mind of the petitioner that it will be harmful or injurious for the petitioner to live with the other party; or”, and “(viii) has not resumed cohabitation after the passing of a decree for judicial separation against that party and— (a) a period of two years has elapsed since the passing of such decree, or (b) the case is one of exceptional hardship to the petitioner or of exceptional depravity on the part of other party; or (ii) for clause (viii) (since repealed in the principal Act) substitute (and shall be deemed to have been substituted) following clause, namely:— [ Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 13 of 1962, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 7-11-1962)]. (i) Cruelty which is a ground for dissolution of marriage may be defined as wilful and unjustifiable conduct of such character as to cause danger to life, limb or health, bodily or mental, or as to give rise to a reasonable apprehension of such a danger. The question of mental cruelty has to be considered in the light of the norms of marital ties of the particular society, to which the parties belong, their social values, status, environment in which they live. Cruelty need not be physical. If from the conduct of the spouse it is established or an inference can be legitimately drawn that the treatment of the spouse is such that it causes apprehension in the mind of the other spouse, about his or her mental welfare then this conduct amounts to cruelty; Maya Devi v. Jagdish Prasad, AIR 2007 SC 1426. (ii) Making false allegations against husband of having illicit relationship and extramarital affairs by wife in her written statement constitute mental cruelty of such nature that husband cannot be reasonably asked to live with wife. Husband is entitled to decree of divorce; Sadhana Srivastava v. Arvind Kumar Srivastava, AIR 2006 All 7. (iii) The expression “Cruelty” as envisaged under section 13 of the Act clearly admits in its ambit and scope such acts which may even cause mental agony to aggrieved party. Intention to be cruel is not an essential element of cruelty as envisaged under section 13 (1) (ia) of the Act. It is sufficient that if the cruelty is of such type that it becomes impossible for spouses to live together; Neelu Kohli v. Naveen Kohli, AIR 2004 All 1. (iv) The levelling of false allegation by one spouse about the other having alleged illicit relations with different persons outside wedlock amounted to mental cruelty; Jai Dayal v. Shakuntala Devi, AIR 2004 Del 39. (v) Mental disorder for relief under section 13 (1) (iii) should be of such a degree that it is impossible to lead normal marital life or it is unreasonable to expect a person to put up with a spouse with such condition; B.N. Panduranga Shet v. S.N. Vijayalaxmi, AIR 2003 Karn 357 (vi) Due to the criminal complaint filed by the wife, the husband remained in jail for 63 days and also his father and brother for 20 to 25 days. Therefore, even though the case of cruelty may not have been proved but as the facts emerging from the record clearly indicate that the living of the two as husband and wife would not only be difficult but impossible, the court has no alternative but to grant a decree of divorce; Poonam Gupta v. Ghanshyam Gupta, AIR 2003 All 51. (vii) Unless the entire genesis of the quarrels in the course of which, one of the spouses holds out a threat to take his or her life is placed before the court, the very fact that some threat in the course of a quarrel is held out, cannot be viewed in isolation or construed as mental cruelty to the other spouse; Nalini Sunder v. G.V. Sundar, AIR 2003 Kar 86. (viii) A husband cannot ask his wife that he does not like her company, but she can or should stay with other members of the family in matrimonial home. Such an attitude is cruelty in itself on the part of the husband; Yudhishter Singh v. Sarita, AIR 2002 Raj 382. (ix) Removal of mangalsutra by wife at the instance of her husband does not amount to mental cruelty; S. Hanumantha Rao v. S. Ramani, AIR 1999 SC 1318. (x) A threat to commit suicide by the wife amounts to infliction of mental cruelty on the husband but it should not be uttered in a domestic tiff; Pushpa Rani v. Vijay Pal Singh, AIR 1994 All 220. (xi) Solitary instance of cruelty would not constitute cruelty so as to grant a decree for divorce rather the behaviour of the other party has to be persistently and repeatedly treating the other spouse with such cruelty so as to cause a reasonable apprehension in the mind of the husband/wife that it will be harmful or injurious for him or her to live with the other party. The expression “persistently” means continue firmly or obstinately and the expression “repeatedly” means to say or do over again; Vimlesh v. Prakash Chand Sharma, AIR 1992 All 261.
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment

Related questions

Need legal suggestions for prevent future circumstances like dv and 498 cases

I m living in Bangalore but wife and daughter (2yrs) lived with my parents in my hometown. Relationship between me and my wife is not good from last 2 years. You can say there is no more trust between us and failure to discharge matrimonial love and life. Her behavior and attitude were changed since last 2 years. So I stopped talking to her. In my opinion it was better to be silent rather than arguing every day. Now she started threatening my parents about domestic violence and dowry case. Tell what kind of prevented action I can take to avoid future circumstanc
0 likes
0 answers
Family
Posted on 25th May, 2019

My daughter was debarred from attending exams and forced to readmission in first year B.Des by NMIMS, School of Design.. owing to low attendance. Can we file a lawsuit against the college in high court?

My daughter was debarred from attending exams and forced to readmission in first year B.Des by NMIMS, School of Design - owing to low attendance. Her attendence was calculated wrongly and also, she attended the classes but she was marked absent. She lost one year of her college. My daughter is a brilliant student who stood 46th in the entrance. And scored 71% in first semester. Can we file a lawsuit against the college in high court?
0 likes
0 answers
Family
Posted on 23rd May, 2019

Desertion of husband

Hi.. I am writing this behalf of my dearest friend.She is very much depressed.We need your suggestions. It's been 2 years of her marriage life and she having 1 and half year baby.Her husband was working in USA in H1B visa.Like every family they also had some misunderstandings and fights in those 2 years.By the by we all know it's actually very common for newly wedded couples to have some fights and then patch up.But when she gave birth to her baby, her mil visits to USA and stayed with them for six months.Her mil always tried to pull her in fuss and create unnecessary problems between her and hubby.Her hubby also listen to his mom's words. Everytime she go behind her hubby and convince him eventhough mistake is not hers.She returned to India with baby along with mil last year for her baby's head tonsuring.Now the problem is her hubby completely abandoned her and child after leaving his place.He not at all picking her phone calls and if he take her call, he hurt her with abusive words and then terminate the call.She was completely in shock about her hubby's sudden change in his behavior, as there was no problem between her and hubby when she travelled from USA.. Since it's been nearly 11 months, still now he didn't yet talk or initiate her visa for her return to his place.He also blocked her in WhatsApp and not coming to any communication.She have lodged a police complaint regarding his desertion.But even after getting summoned neither her hubby or his parents didn't came in person to PS.They threatened her if she moves further they will proceed for the divorce and asked her to withdraw the complaint.Now she had withdrawn it for the sake of her baby.As she was in dependent visa in those 2 years, she was now having career break.Now her hubby sending a small amount every month after her multiple emails to send some money for her and baby's expenses.All her gold and her academic certificates are in hubby's house.She is a only daughter to her parents.By seeing her situation her parents became ill.Her mother suffering from Chronic kidney disease and soon going to undergo dialysis.My friend has no other support and she was the only responsibility to take care of her child.Her parents tried to solve the problems by taking her and child to hubby's home in Chennai.But his parents have locked the house and hidden somewhere near by, by knowing her arrival by one of the relative.She asked about this to her husband through email.He said to leave and return to her home town and further he lied that his parents were out of town for three more weeks.She trust his words and came back to her home town with her baby.But later she came to know they were hidden and stayed in nearby house for 3 days and came back to their home once they get to know that she have travelled back to her hometown.Now my friend also having health issues due to this problems.As she was a Fresher due to her career break, she has applied for a job in a startup company with very low salary. But she don't want her mil to enjoy her absence, as she was the main reason behind all these dramas and she was enjoying wealthy life by getting huge amount from her son every month.But my friend was now facing financial issues.She was trying again to patch up with her hubby through elders, who was common relative for both the family.From them she get to Know that her hubby and his family were coming with some conditions like, she should provide written statements that she will not go for legal proceedings and she should not open her mouth at any cause once she join her hubby.Now she is very much confused, after all the harrasments from hubby and his family, whether she still needs to do all this for the sake of her baby.But she was worried how a man could be like this by without seeing or talking to his own child for long months.She don't know for what she still need to hold up this relationship. She is in the confusion whether to look for the job in her home town. If so her hubby and mil will feel relax for her absence.Or to go legally to fight for her rights(But she knows very well it will lead to divorce which she don't want to do for the sake of baby) Or to give written statements as they ask and patch up with hubby? But she fears if she gave written statement, hubby side will take advantage and will further harass her. She needs to come out of this situation.What is your point of view?What she can do? Please give your suggestions..
0 likes
0 answers
Family
Posted on 23rd May, 2019
Find the best lawyers/advocates and book legal services.