Select Location

Monsanto Loses In Legal Battle With India Over Cotton Patents: Check The Legal Points

Monsanto loses the legal battle against India over the patent on genetically modified cotton seeds. The case related patent on the genetically modified cotton seeds started when Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd did not agree to settle a long-standing intellectual property dispute with Monsanto. Let us check the legal facts of the case.

On April 11th, Wednesday court ruled that Monsanto can not claim patents on its genetically modified cotton seeds in India. Delhi High Court agreed with Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd (NSL) that India’s Patent Act does not allow Monsanto any patent cover for its GM cotton seeds. 

Disappointed with the court’s order, Monsanto India spokesman said the company was very disappointed with the court order stated that the order is going to have a wide range of negative implications for biotech based innovation across many sectors within India, and is inconsistent with other international markets where agricultural innovation has flourished.

In 2016, the Indian farm ministry cut Monsanto’s royalties by more than 70 percent, triggering a long-running feud that drew in the Indian and U.S. governments. In March, India cut the royalties paid to the company for its genetically modified cotton seeds for the second time in the period of two years which fueled another row with the U.S. company which threatened to leave India in 2016.

At the end of 2017, NSL said it would not be settled a long-standing intellectual property dispute with Monsanto over genetically modified cotton though other Indian companies settled to it. Kalyan Goswami, director general of the National Seed Association of India claimed that the false claim of Monsanto got exposed.

The Indian legal points which were involved in this case are as follows:

  • The government enacted the Cotton Seeds Price (Control) Order and subsequently notified the licensing guidelines and formats for GM technology licensing agreements, Monsanto continued with a misinformed campaign that the Ministry of Agriculture wrongly invoked the provisions of compulsory licensing of the Patent Act.
  • Sec. 26 of the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights (PPVFR) Act 2001 states the right to make a claim before PPVFR Authority for benefit sharing based on the agronomic value the Bollgard trait confers to various new varieties developed by breeders, but it is not applicable for transgenic varieties. It has been clarified by the government in IPR Policy 2016.
  • The National Seed Association of India asked the Ministry of Agriculture to implement the PPVFR Act without any distortion. If intellectual property law in compliance with Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights were implemented, it would be a distortion though it gave a right to Monsanto the right to claim.

To know more about your custodial rights, consult the IPR lawyers through MyAdvo, download MyAdvo App on your phone.


At MyAdvo we have a mission of making legal simple. MyAdvo acts as Client's legal concierge providing technology solutions for Lawyer Discovery, Price Discovery and Case updates. We at MyAdvo has a network of 10,000+ advocates across the 600+ districts and has served 2700+ individuals and 100+ corporates for their diversified legal needs and requirements. You can consult a lawyer online, ask a legal question from them and find the best lawyers online.

Follow MyAdvo for daily legal news and top legal updates.


Reviewed by:
Rashmita Das
Published on 12-Apr-18

Book a Legal Service