Select Location

WRONG FSL DONE SIGNATURE OF CHEQUE WITH CHANGED SIGNATURES

In my case a person given a cheque for Rs.1 Lac bearing his signature. this cheque returned unpaid with insufficient funds remarks. we have sued him under section 138. accused filed fir in separate court that sign on cheque and account is not opened by him so direct the police to send this cheque to fsl. He also said that account is not opened by him this is opened by me. police sent this cheque & a/c opening form opened bearing sign done in 1987 (when his age was 18 years) with completely cha
0 likes
1 answers
Criminal
Posted on 27-Jan-19
Advocate arnab kumar
Answered on 30-Jan-19
you argue the court where he filed FIR that it is his account and he opened it. ask the court to get confirmation from bank about whose account it is. file quash petition.
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment

Related questions

bnss or crpc

fir was register in 2021 and investigation was still going in under crpc then the bnss comes and police issued notice under bnss35 and arrested me using bnss checklist and filed chargeshet using bnss, but section 531 clearly says pending investigation should be completed using crpc not bnss, so can i challenge the charge sheet or my arrest during the trail
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 20-Aug-25

Single disputed transaction, but 2 different ncrp complaints

A sum of ₹49,000 was credited to the customer’s account only once. This is the sole disputed transaction in question. In compliance with a court order, ₹49,000 has already been deducted and paid to the concerned party. However, in complete violation of banking norms and legal principles, a second recovery attempt of ₹38,500 is being initiated under the same transaction reference, even though no such amount was ever credited or transacted in the account. To make matters worse, another agency from a different state has placed an additional hold of ₹49,000 for the same transaction, despite the disputed amount having already been recovered. This amounts to unlawful double jeopardy, duplicate holds, and harassment, besides violating RBI regulations and due process of law. Immediate corrective action is required to cancel the baseless ₹38,500 recovery, remove the duplicate ₹49,000 hold, and confirm that no further deductions will be made against the same transaction.
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 13-Aug-25

Threatening calls and messages

Hi, There are multiple threatening calls on my WhatsApp from different persons who are abusing me and threatening me. From what I have understood someone has given my number to them after their quarrel on a video game and they think that person is me without even knowing my name or background. They are calling and messaging me from different numbers. Their abuses are highly racial and they are threatening me with harm. I have filed a cyber cell complaint but nothing has happened yet. They have even abused my wife and threatened her after overhearing her voice from behind when I was on a call with them. I am looking for a solution where these guys are punished by law.
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 03-Jul-25
Find the best lawyers/advocates and book legal services.