Select Location

What to do when someone complain a fir against you in a bike accident

Some one put a fir against me to harrash me I just accidentally have a accident with him with my bike while he was walking on foot What should I do now
0 likes
4 answers
Criminal
Posted on 16-Jan-19
N
Advocate nipun
Answered on 16-Jan-19
After the FIR is filed against you, may be for the offence of Rash Driving, you will be summoned by the court. Appear with an Advocate and file an Application of Discharge under Section 239 of Cr.P.C. Otherwise, the trial will began and would take time for the disposal of the matter.
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment
Advocate Ashutosh
Answered on 25-Jan-19
first of all get anticipatory bail or bail in the matter once it is done that after request the police officers to obtain the video footage of the accident is available as find out the local witnesses and ensure that is taken to task
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment
D
Advocate DEEPTI
Answered on 14-Feb-19
contact 9971997738 .i am a MACT LAWYER
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment
R
Advocate Rameshwoar
Answered on 16-Feb-19
If u call police officer if yes then solve it peacefully otherwise don't worry
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment

Related questions

My account has got a lein of 3655 rs in layer 3 from Pathankot Punjab. Can I leave this matter as it is

It's a game withdrawal
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 07-Mar-26

bnss or crpc

fir was register in 2021 and investigation was still going in under crpc then the bnss comes and police issued notice under bnss35 and arrested me using bnss checklist and filed chargeshet using bnss, but section 531 clearly says pending investigation should be completed using crpc not bnss, so can i challenge the charge sheet or my arrest during the trail
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 20-Aug-25

Single disputed transaction, but 2 different ncrp complaints

A sum of ₹49,000 was credited to the customer’s account only once. This is the sole disputed transaction in question. In compliance with a court order, ₹49,000 has already been deducted and paid to the concerned party. However, in complete violation of banking norms and legal principles, a second recovery attempt of ₹38,500 is being initiated under the same transaction reference, even though no such amount was ever credited or transacted in the account. To make matters worse, another agency from a different state has placed an additional hold of ₹49,000 for the same transaction, despite the disputed amount having already been recovered. This amounts to unlawful double jeopardy, duplicate holds, and harassment, besides violating RBI regulations and due process of law. Immediate corrective action is required to cancel the baseless ₹38,500 recovery, remove the duplicate ₹49,000 hold, and confirm that no further deductions will be made against the same transaction.
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 13-Aug-25
Find the best lawyers/advocates and book legal services.