What act applies on if a married woman have relationship with someone ely

It's a game withdrawal

fir was register in 2021 and investigation was still going in under crpc then the bnss comes and police issued notice under bnss35 and arrested me using bnss checklist and filed chargeshet using bnss, but section 531 clearly says pending investigation should be completed using crpc not bnss, so can i challenge the charge sheet or my arrest during the trail

A sum of ₹49,000 was credited to the customer’s account only once. This is the sole disputed transaction in question. In compliance with a court order, ₹49,000 has already been deducted and paid to the concerned party. However, in complete violation of banking norms and legal principles, a second recovery attempt of ₹38,500 is being initiated under the same transaction reference, even though no such amount was ever credited or transacted in the account. To make matters worse, another agency from a different state has placed an additional hold of ₹49,000 for the same transaction, despite the disputed amount having already been recovered. This amounts to unlawful double jeopardy, duplicate holds, and harassment, besides violating RBI regulations and due process of law. Immediate corrective action is required to cancel the baseless ₹38,500 recovery, remove the duplicate ₹49,000 hold, and confirm that no further deductions will be made against the same transaction.