Select Location

My opponent threatened to kill me during that incidence.

I had a heated argument with my neighbor. My opponent threatened to kill me during that incidence. So I reported to the concerned police station and lodged a complaint against my opponent. The police told me that they will allot one officer to me soon and he will investigate. So can anyone guide me what is the standard procedure in this scenario and what steps police will take in this matter? what needs to be done next? Also is there any necessity of advocate and at which stage I can contac
0 likes
3 answers
Criminal
Posted on 11-Feb-19
D
Advocate DEEPTI
Answered on 14-Feb-19
WAIT FOR FEW DAYS .IF POLICE IS NOT RESPONDING THAN U CAN CONTACT A LAWYER WHO CAN FILE A COMPLAINT IN THE COURT.YOU CAN CONTACTT ME THRU MY EMAIL ID dogradeepti@gmail.com.
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment
R
Advocate Rameshwoar
Answered on 16-Feb-19
Go to the nearest police station and register your complaint against them immediately for Ur security
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment
R
Advocate Rameshwoar
Answered on 16-Feb-19
Go to the nearest police station and register your complaint against them immediately
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment

Related questions

My account has got a lein of 3655 rs in layer 3 from Pathankot Punjab. Can I leave this matter as it is

It's a game withdrawal
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 07-Mar-26

bnss or crpc

fir was register in 2021 and investigation was still going in under crpc then the bnss comes and police issued notice under bnss35 and arrested me using bnss checklist and filed chargeshet using bnss, but section 531 clearly says pending investigation should be completed using crpc not bnss, so can i challenge the charge sheet or my arrest during the trail
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 20-Aug-25

Single disputed transaction, but 2 different ncrp complaints

A sum of ₹49,000 was credited to the customer’s account only once. This is the sole disputed transaction in question. In compliance with a court order, ₹49,000 has already been deducted and paid to the concerned party. However, in complete violation of banking norms and legal principles, a second recovery attempt of ₹38,500 is being initiated under the same transaction reference, even though no such amount was ever credited or transacted in the account. To make matters worse, another agency from a different state has placed an additional hold of ₹49,000 for the same transaction, despite the disputed amount having already been recovered. This amounts to unlawful double jeopardy, duplicate holds, and harassment, besides violating RBI regulations and due process of law. Immediate corrective action is required to cancel the baseless ₹38,500 recovery, remove the duplicate ₹49,000 hold, and confirm that no further deductions will be made against the same transaction.
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 13-Aug-25
Find the best lawyers/advocates and book legal services.