Select Location

If I have affair outside marriage and don't want to continue existing marriage with husband, can I get divorce

Our marriage since 16yrs. We have 2kids. My husband is womaniser, after caught too many times he don't have control on himself. Now one gentleman come in my life and we genuinely want to marry eachother, so I want advice from you how can I go further
0 likes
2 answers
Criminal
Posted on 30-Jul-18
Advocate Junaid Ali
Answered on 07-Aug-18
If your husband agrees to this proposition then you can file for Mutual Consent Divorce. But if your husband doesn't agree to it then you can file for divorce on certain grounds against your husband.
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment
V
Advocate Varun
Answered on 09-Aug-18
You may file for divorce with mutual consent (section 13-B), in case the husband agrees. Else you should file a petition under section 13(1)(i) that is Divorce on grounds of Adultery. The contentions needs to be proven though.
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment

Related questions

My account has got a lein of 3655 rs in layer 3 from Pathankot Punjab. Can I leave this matter as it is

It's a game withdrawal
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 07-Mar-26

bnss or crpc

fir was register in 2021 and investigation was still going in under crpc then the bnss comes and police issued notice under bnss35 and arrested me using bnss checklist and filed chargeshet using bnss, but section 531 clearly says pending investigation should be completed using crpc not bnss, so can i challenge the charge sheet or my arrest during the trail
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 20-Aug-25

Single disputed transaction, but 2 different ncrp complaints

A sum of ₹49,000 was credited to the customer’s account only once. This is the sole disputed transaction in question. In compliance with a court order, ₹49,000 has already been deducted and paid to the concerned party. However, in complete violation of banking norms and legal principles, a second recovery attempt of ₹38,500 is being initiated under the same transaction reference, even though no such amount was ever credited or transacted in the account. To make matters worse, another agency from a different state has placed an additional hold of ₹49,000 for the same transaction, despite the disputed amount having already been recovered. This amounts to unlawful double jeopardy, duplicate holds, and harassment, besides violating RBI regulations and due process of law. Immediate corrective action is required to cancel the baseless ₹38,500 recovery, remove the duplicate ₹49,000 hold, and confirm that no further deductions will be made against the same transaction.
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 13-Aug-25
Find the best lawyers/advocates and book legal services.