Select Location

Case against my Girl friend or wife and police officer harrasment

Hi, I was in a relationship with my lover since 2010. Then we got married(using mangal sutra) the witness is my mom and 1 friend on 1-Jan-2011. But we didn't register it. her parents were not aware of that. Later my wife informed that she is pregnant and so I ask her what she wants to do so she told me that she wants to give a born to our baby and I support her and after 6 month she went to the hospital with her few friend and abort my baby without informing me even she is not talking to me for
0 likes
1 answers
Criminal
Posted on 05-Jul-18
R
Advocate Rajiv
Answered on 06-Jul-18
You want to initiate legal proceedings against your friend who entered into relationship with you, aborted the baby and has not filed any case against you. At this stage of life, you are legally liable for providing maintenance to her but she has not made any claims so it is alright. It is not clear as to why she has ignored you. At this stage, it would be better to talk to her instead of looking for legal angles.
0 Comments
You need to be logged in to comment

Related questions

My account has got a lein of 3655 rs in layer 3 from Pathankot Punjab. Can I leave this matter as it is

It's a game withdrawal
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 07-Mar-26

bnss or crpc

fir was register in 2021 and investigation was still going in under crpc then the bnss comes and police issued notice under bnss35 and arrested me using bnss checklist and filed chargeshet using bnss, but section 531 clearly says pending investigation should be completed using crpc not bnss, so can i challenge the charge sheet or my arrest during the trail
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 20-Aug-25

Single disputed transaction, but 2 different ncrp complaints

A sum of ₹49,000 was credited to the customer’s account only once. This is the sole disputed transaction in question. In compliance with a court order, ₹49,000 has already been deducted and paid to the concerned party. However, in complete violation of banking norms and legal principles, a second recovery attempt of ₹38,500 is being initiated under the same transaction reference, even though no such amount was ever credited or transacted in the account. To make matters worse, another agency from a different state has placed an additional hold of ₹49,000 for the same transaction, despite the disputed amount having already been recovered. This amounts to unlawful double jeopardy, duplicate holds, and harassment, besides violating RBI regulations and due process of law. Immediate corrective action is required to cancel the baseless ₹38,500 recovery, remove the duplicate ₹49,000 hold, and confirm that no further deductions will be made against the same transaction.
0 likes
0 answers
Criminal
Posted on 13-Aug-25
Find the best lawyers/advocates and book legal services.